Establish what permits a payment to move.
Bring the rules, approvals and evidence behind one exception process together. Give your team and AI worker a reviewed basis for each decision.
Every exception should not require rebuilding the answer.
The amount may be within a manager’s limit while a required check is still unresolved. A customer term may require additional evidence. An approval may no longer cover the proposed action.
The process owner needs to know which rule applies, who may approve and what remains missing. Veridom keeps those questions connected to their evidence.
From company evidence to an accountable decision.
Establish
ALEX proposes an operating model from a bounded corpus. Your process owner resolves material questions and publishes the reviewed state.
Govern
Reviewed payment conditions are tested and activated. The worker gathers evidence and proposes an action; separate approval and ACE checks determine whether it may proceed.
Maintain
The evidence record preserves the decision and outcome. Registered changes trace recorded dependencies and return affected work for reconsideration.
A worker that proceeds when permitted, and stops when it must.
The walkthrough follows a £16,200.35 exception through investigation, separate approval, ACE checks and receipt reconciliation. A second case remains held because of a fraud concern.
The recording uses synthetic records and simulated execution against an already reviewed model. It does not move money.
Watch the walkthrough →One team. One process. Eight weeks.
USD 7,000, milestone-paid under an agreed scope. For payment-operations teams with a committed process owner, a reviewer, usable source documents and historical cases.
We establish a reviewed model and replay historical cases. Together we measure corrections, reviewer time and useful change impact. Operational payment exceptions are in scope; sanctions and financial-crime clearance are excluded. Live payment execution is outside the initial pilot.